|
|
zunami23
Hall of Famer
 Offline
Posts: 15072
Respect: +1312
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: September 12, 2007, 03:22:20 am » |
0
|
Why Pecherov? Daniels instead of him, but I still wouldn't do it as a Denver fan. Camby is just too valuable for them on defense. I'd like for Martin to be traded, but he has to boost his trade value first.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Happiness1982
MVP
Offline
Posts: 12336
Respect: +1
|
|
« Reply #32 on: September 12, 2007, 04:06:40 am » |
0
|
pecherov makes money work really, daniels is valuable to dc.
from denver, its just saving money and getting martin the hell out of there. frankly, i see denver wanting this more lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
zunami23
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 15072
Respect: +1312
|
|
« Reply #33 on: September 12, 2007, 04:42:38 am » |
0
|
Well Denver wouldn't want it all. Camby's too valuable. Stevenson, Jamison and Daniels for Camby, K-Mart, JR and Atkins? I hate JR and I remember you saying you had a thing for super talents with booger brains.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Happiness1982
MVP
Offline
Posts: 12336
Respect: +1
|
|
« Reply #34 on: September 12, 2007, 04:49:38 am » |
0
|
haha yeah I do! I really like Smith (i dont like him as a car driver).
that deals okay but the whole thing swings on Denver wanting to cut payroll, thats the whole basis of my deal. if they dont want to that much then camby isnt going anywhere. but if they feel he's doomed due to his age and awful injury history then its a great deal imo. anyway, this is OT.
Steve, would you move Arenas for Ray Felton and something else (morrison for example) and filler?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
zunami23
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 15072
Respect: +1312
|
|
« Reply #35 on: September 12, 2007, 05:24:56 am » |
0
|
that deals okay but the whole thing swings on Denver wanting to cut payroll, thats the whole basis of my deal. Jamison would have a new contract so the Nuggets would be cutting payroll. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Happiness1982
MVP
Offline
Posts: 12336
Respect: +1
|
|
« Reply #36 on: September 12, 2007, 05:55:02 am » |
0
|
he has one year left on his current deal i believe, so any time before the deadline renders his next contract is moot, no?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
zunami23
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 15072
Respect: +1312
|
|
« Reply #37 on: September 12, 2007, 06:11:06 am » |
0
|
Yeah, but I was talking about a sign-and-trade the whole time.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Happiness1982
MVP
Offline
Posts: 12336
Respect: +1
|
|
« Reply #38 on: September 12, 2007, 06:28:19 am » |
0
|
haha ok well that makes things tricky as if Jamison get even close to 16mil next time i'll join the michael vick fan club!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
zunami23
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 15072
Respect: +1312
|
|
« Reply #39 on: September 12, 2007, 06:49:14 am » |
0
|
According to my calculations the trade would work if Jamison made 6 M per year. Denver would have over 5 M more outgoing value than incoming value.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Happiness1982
MVP
Offline
Posts: 12336
Respect: +1
|
|
« Reply #40 on: September 12, 2007, 07:13:49 am » |
0
|
Im confused. Who's trade? Camby and Martin comes to about 23 mil so...
and your trade (if jamison=6 mil) isnt even close. one of us is clearly wrong lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
zunami23
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 15072
Respect: +1312
|
|
« Reply #41 on: September 12, 2007, 07:18:19 am » |
0
|
Im confused. Who's trade? Camby and Martin comes to about 23 mil so...
and your trade (if jamison=6 mil) isnt even close. one of us is clearly wrong lol I'm talking about the trade I just proposed. Martin, Camby, Atkins and JR for Jamison, Stevenson, Daniels and Thomas. Values within 25% of each other. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Happiness1982
MVP
Offline
Posts: 12336
Respect: +1
|
|
« Reply #42 on: September 12, 2007, 07:31:43 am » |
0
|
lol arguing like it's 2006!
denver gives 29.6 to 21.4. thats doesnt work, Jigga!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
zunami23
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 15072
Respect: +1312
|
|
« Reply #43 on: September 12, 2007, 08:00:01 am » |
0
|
lol arguing like it's 2006!
denver gives 29.6 to 21.4. thats doesnt work, Jigga! *Sigh*...couldn't you just take my word for it? You got the numbers way off for some reason. Salaries are obviously from '08-'09. Martin: 14.18 Camby: 8.0 Atkins: 3.4 JR: 2.33 =27.91 M Thomas: 6.86 Stevenson: 3.62 Daniels: 6.2 =16.68 M 16.68 M + 6M (Jamison)=22.68 22.68*1.25=28.35 M |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Happiness1982
MVP
Offline
Posts: 12336
Respect: +1
|
|
« Reply #44 on: September 12, 2007, 08:20:41 am » |
0
|
no look I'LL sigh first! haha Well thats foolishness. i didnt realise what you were on about. whyt would they want to sign jamison for another big contract over his expiring one now? he doesnt fit, it only works now because of the contract.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
