Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
 
Author Topic: Troy Hudson signs with the Warriors  (Read 6118 times)
td21
All-Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3113

Respect: 0

« Reply #15 on: October 01, 2007, 02:44:20 pm »
0

good pick up but the wizards (who have the worst and the least talented bench in the L) should have got this guy.
Logged
steve
MVP
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12058


I've grown to hate you all.

Respect: +1110

« Reply #16 on: October 01, 2007, 05:27:43 pm »
0

God, why?  I don't see why they'd need a 6'1" gunner coming off the bench when he wouldn't be getting much playing time.
Logged

Put my existence on this forum against yours.  Toronto makes the playoffs.
naptown
Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1743


Respect: 0

« Reply #17 on: October 01, 2007, 06:20:10 pm »
0

exactly
Logged
KrissKross
Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1824

Respect: +9

« Reply #18 on: October 02, 2007, 06:30:34 pm »
0

I read that we just got Tierre Brown and Pat Burke too. Why the heck are we concentrated on small guys? Should've concentrated on getting a good big guy, not Pat Burke! What's he gonna do for us!?
Logged

KrissKross
B-ball fan 11
MVP
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6909

Respect: +2

« Reply #19 on: October 04, 2007, 06:27:30 pm »
0

Quote from: "KrissKross"
I questioned why the Warriors did this. The only reason i come up with is Warriors are patching up that hole they open when they traded for size by sending Jrich for Wright, but WHY HUDSON?


he's a backup PG, you could do worse.
Logged
steve
MVP
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12058


I've grown to hate you all.

Respect: +1110

« Reply #20 on: October 04, 2007, 09:27:43 pm »
0

Quote from: "KrissKross"
I read that we just got Tierre Brown and Pat Burke too. Why the heck are we concentrated on small guys? Should've concentrated on getting a good big guy, not Pat Burke! What's he gonna do for us!?


Pat Burke's 6'10" or 6'11".
Logged

Put my existence on this forum against yours.  Toronto makes the playoffs.
t-mac357
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 23980


Respect: +227

« Reply #21 on: October 05, 2007, 04:28:16 am »
0

Quote from: "steve"
Quote from: "KrissKross"
I read that we just got Tierre Brown and Pat Burke too. Why the heck are we concentrated on small guys? Should've concentrated on getting a good big guy, not Pat Burke! What's he gonna do for us!?


Pat Burke's 6'10" or 6'11".


i think he was referring to hudson and brown(when he said small guys) , because he adressed burke in a completely different sentence while referring to him as a big guy
Logged

Hopper15
Undrafted
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 15

Respect: 0

« Reply #22 on: October 06, 2007, 01:18:00 pm »
0

Quote from: "steve"
God, why?  I don't see why they'd need a 6'1" gunner coming off the bench when he wouldn't be getting much playing time.


Ever heard of a third point guard.  In todays Nba you need them especially when you have Baron Davis on your team who's subject to injury at some point.
Logged
KrissKross
Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1824

Respect: +9

« Reply #23 on: October 11, 2007, 02:15:05 pm »
0

Quote from: "Hopper15"
Quote from: "steve"
God, why?  I don't see why they'd need a 6'1" gunner coming off the bench when he wouldn't be getting much playing time.


Ever heard of a third point guard.  In todays Nba you need them especially when you have Baron Davis on your team who's subject to injury at some point.


We have four PGs right now actually. Davis, Ellis, Hudson, and Brown. There some other guards listed. Taking caution a bit far there imo

 All im saying is we have too many small guys. We were beat in the playoffs because Utah's big men abuse us, warriors should address that more!
Logged

KrissKross
B-ball fan 11
MVP
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6909

Respect: +2

« Reply #24 on: October 14, 2007, 09:44:30 pm »
0

Quote from: "KrissKross"
Quote from: "Hopper15"
Quote from: "steve"
God, why?  I don't see why they'd need a 6'1" gunner coming off the bench when he wouldn't be getting much playing time.


Ever heard of a third point guard.  In todays Nba you need them especially when you have Baron Davis on your team who's subject to injury at some point.


We have four PGs right now actually. Davis, Ellis, Hudson, and Brown. There some other guards listed. Taking caution a bit far there imo

 All im saying is we have too many small guys. We were beat in the playoffs because Utah's big men abuse us, warriors should address that more!


Ellis is going to start the 2 and you got B. Wright so you did something in the big man department.
Logged
EASTCOAST ASSASIN
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 621


Respect: 0

« Reply #25 on: October 27, 2007, 12:00:13 pm »
0

they already have a point guard shouldnt they get a shooting guard i dont think troy will be a starting shooting guard
Logged



 go to doyles because flarhety said so.
I'm on the Scola will make it to the all star game bandwagon.
Shard
Starter
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1385

Respect: 0

« Reply #26 on: October 27, 2007, 05:18:31 pm »
0

Quote from: "mohammad_baller_tmac"
Monta will just play backup SG or starting..who knows. But Golden State has to bring back Pietrus. HE's a great player and athlete.

Two players right now that should be picked up soon:

Earl Boykins..Cleveland?
Mikeal Pietrus...I know miami was intrested but some teams could use his athletic ability. Houston?


thats true, cavs lack pg

and its true pietrus has a huge upside, but warriors want to get something good if he leaves to a different team.
Logged

Quote from: "LKdude"
I don't think the Bucks will be approaching the playoffs soon.  

Quote from: "BteamBomber"
Washington, Toronto and Miami won't be better than the Bulls next season.  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
 
 
Jump to: