Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
 
Author Topic: Roster Fun  (Read 2541 times)
obijethro
Undrafted
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 85

Respect: 0

« on: September 04, 2006, 10:43:36 pm »
0

Ok Indiana has had a bunch of fun trades and crazy moves this year and here is a even crazyer idea to finish it out.

According to Hoopshypes the Pacers are looking at wells and they have 18 roster spots here is a way to fix that.

This would start out as a 3 team trade.

Indiana Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Rawle Marshall
Josh Powell
David Harrison
Jeff Foster
Stephen Jackson

Incoming
Rafael Araujo
Jamaal Magloire
Dan Dickau

Utah Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Rafael Araujo
Jerron Collins

Incoming
Rawle Marshall
Josh Powell
David Harrison
Juan Dixon

Portland Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Jamaal Magloire
Dan Dickau
Juan Dixon

Incoming
Jeff Foster
Stephen Jackson
Jerron Collins

Then the last part is a sign and trade with Sac

Indy trades
Dan Dickau
Rafael Araujo
John Edwards

Kings trade
Bonzi Wells
Ronnie Price

This give almost a full turn over for the pacers and makes the one of the most deepest teams in the NBA.

This also helps oy bith Utah and Portland so I dont think it would be that bad of an idea. Yet I do not think it would happen, just fun to speckulate.
Logged

English Pacer
Journeyman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 101


Respect: 0

« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2006, 01:17:28 am »
0

Is their any substance to the rumours of us wanting Bonzi? or is it just internet talk?
Logged

Man!!! U aint Charles Barkley
UNIT
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17983


Respect: +57

« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2006, 03:34:21 am »
0

i would rather have jackson then bonzi.. for our roster
Logged
olsons3
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 633

Respect: 0

« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2006, 08:57:44 am »
0

The Pacers have stated previously that they are not interested in Bonzi, because of his issues on and off the court.  Now if the price drops, the interest around the league might change.  Right now, he doesn't fit into the plans.  We are already thick with Swingmen.

The trade idea seems pretty cool.  You should try to run it through the ESPN trade machine, because many of the players listed have trade restrictions on them.
Logged

Boom Baby!!!!
olsons3
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 633

Respect: 0

« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2006, 09:05:58 am »
0

Quote from: "Bball Unit"
i would rather have jackson then bonzi.. for our roster


I would rather have neither.  Both are good, but both come with much baggage.  Jackson only seems to be an issue when playing with other issues, like Oneal.  Oneal whines, and Jackson starts doing the same.

Bonzi on the other hand is able to be a headcase all by himself, and needs a strong leader holding his reigns.  He played well with Artest.  Why he chose Free Agency is beyond me.  Greed will cost him.
Logged

Boom Baby!!!!
t-mac357
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 23980


Respect: +227

« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2006, 12:46:23 pm »
0

Quote from: "Bball Unit"
i would rather have jackson then bonzi.. for our roster


well its your team even though bonzi is much better
Logged

kwolffsc
Starter
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1234

Respect: 0

« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2006, 12:51:39 pm »
0

wow most interesting trade rumor ever! wow

Mine
T-mac for Saraunas Jackevicius
Logged


UNIT
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17983


Respect: +57

« Reply #7 on: September 05, 2006, 09:21:48 pm »
0

Quote from: "kwolffsc"
wow most interesting trade rumor ever! wow

Mine
T-mac for Saraunas Jackevicius


SOLD!
Logged
UNIT
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17983


Respect: +57

« Reply #8 on: September 05, 2006, 09:23:59 pm »
0

Quote from: "t-mac357"
Quote from: "Bball Unit"
i would rather have jackson then bonzi.. for our roster


well its your team even though bonzi is much better

i prefer jax ova bonzi coz..

if u forget bonzis playoff series he isnt any better then jax..

and we need 3 point shooters which jackson is better at then bonzi.. plus he already knows are system..
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 
 
Jump to: