jmlamerson
Starter
 Offline
Posts: 1410
Respect: +1
|
 |
« on: September 09, 2006, 07:43:30 pm » |
0
|
This is probably the best Pacers team since 98. We have a potential All-Star at every position (if you count ONeal as a center). Our lineup of:
PG - Tinsley
SG - Jackson
SF - Granger
PF - Harrington
C - O'Neal
is better than any in the East. And the bench is the deppest in the entire NBA. Miami is an old team getting older, the Nets still have no backcourt size, and the Pistons are disintigrating. The Bucks, Raptors, and Magic are all too young. Chicago has the best shot, but they aren't going anywhere with Skiles as coach and no decent PF. It is a very good year to be a Pacers fan.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2006, 08:11:32 pm » |
0
|
This is probably the best Pacers team since 98. We have a potential All-Star at every position (if you count ONeal as a center). Our lineup of:
PG - Tinsley
SG - Jackson
SF - Granger
PF - Harrington
C - O'Neal
is better than any in the East. And the bench is the deppest in the entire NBA. Miami is an old team getting older, the Nets still have no backcourt size, and the Pistons are disintigrating. The Bucks, Raptors, and Magic are all too young. Chicago has the best shot, but they aren't going anywhere with Skiles as coach and no decent PF. It is a very good year to be a Pacers fan. i agree execpt.. 1. we are only going to be successful if we have a healthy tinsley.. 2. chicago have decent PFs in brown/thomas.. 3. skiles is a good coach.. its more that they dont have much scoring punch except gordon.. 4. i still see pistons as a dangerous team.. 5. rick has to change his robot style too suit that lineup.. but yeah if are badluck of last 2yrs run out.. then this could be a fun yr.. and harrington is good luck.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cselby
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 42172
Respect: +2791
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2006, 08:53:02 pm » |
0
|
This is probably the best Pacers team since 98. We have a potential All-Star at every position (if you count ONeal as a center). Our lineup of:
PG - Tinsley
SG - Jackson
SF - Granger
PF - Harrington
C - O'Neal
is better than any in the East. And the bench is the deppest in the entire NBA. Miami is an old team getting older, the Nets still have no backcourt size, and the Pistons are disintigrating. The Bucks, Raptors, and Magic are all too young. Chicago has the best shot, but they aren't going anywhere with Skiles as coach and no decent PF. It is a very good year to be a Pacers fan. LOL not the best in the East. Tinsley is an average PG and Jackson is an average SG. Granger has many things to improve upon, and then true, two very good players in Al and J'Oneal but still not the best. Nice try though. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Soon.... |
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2006, 09:27:57 pm » |
0
|
This is probably the best Pacers team since 98. We have a potential All-Star at every position (if you count ONeal as a center). Our lineup of:
PG - Tinsley
SG - Jackson
SF - Granger
PF - Harrington
C - O'Neal
is better than any in the East. And the bench is the deppest in the entire NBA. Miami is an old team getting older, the Nets still have no backcourt size, and the Pistons are disintigrating. The Bucks, Raptors, and Magic are all too young. Chicago has the best shot, but they aren't going anywhere with Skiles as coach and no decent PF. It is a very good year to be a Pacers fan. LOL not the best in the East. Tinsley is an average PG and Jackson is an average SG. Granger has many things to improve upon, and then true, two very good players in Al and J'Oneal but still not the best. Nice try though. tinsley can make allstar is billups continues his form from the end of last yr.. onl AI and Gilbert are better in the east.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
t-mac357
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 23980
Respect: +227
|
|
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2006, 01:29:37 am » |
0
|
tinsley an all star, please
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
|
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2006, 02:42:50 am » |
0
|
whos better then him apart from ai,arenas,billups in the east?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Shaq Daddy
Undrafted
Offline
Posts: 63
Respect: 0
|
|
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2006, 04:51:02 am » |
0
|
Jason Kidd !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2006, 06:29:16 am » |
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Maia®
Journeyman
Offline
Posts: 159
Respect: 0
|
|
« Reply #8 on: September 10, 2006, 09:19:56 am » |
0
|
It scares me, but I have to say marbury(even I don't like him as a player) is better than tinsley. and Kidd is really better than tinsley. He's the best passing PG in the NBA together with nash, he's the best rebounder, and one of the best defenders at PG and last but not least, he's a winner!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cselby
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 42172
Respect: +2791
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 10, 2006, 10:10:43 am » |
0
|
ummm also Ford, J-Will, J-Kidd, plus a crop of rookies who could easily overtake him. Tinsley sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Soon.... |
|
|
t-mac357
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 23980
Respect: +227
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 10, 2006, 11:22:42 pm » |
0
|
ummm also Ford, J-Will, J-Kidd, plus a crop of rookies who could easily overtake him. Tinsley sucks. dang, that was harsh, b-ball unit won't appreciate that, lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2006, 01:45:49 am » |
0
|
It scares me, but I have to say marbury(even I don't like him as a player) is better than tinsley. and Kidd is really better than tinsley. He's the best passing PG in the NBA together with nash, he's the best rebounder, and one of the best defenders at PG and last but not least, he's a winner! pacers win 64% of games when tinsley plays more then 32 mins... how is he not a winner? did you even watch kidd the last couple months of last season.. anthony johnson ate him for lunch.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2006, 01:46:27 am » |
0
|
ummm also Ford, J-Will, J-Kidd, plus a crop of rookies who could easily overtake him. Tinsley sucks. .. did you see tinsley before he was injured.. he took j williams too school in those opening games against miami.. tj ford cant pass or create his own shot like tinsley.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2006, 01:48:40 am » |
0
|
the only thing ill agree on.. is that marbury when not distracted has better overall game.. and he might show abit of that again this year.. im still tipping new york for 8th spot in east..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mrsaturdaynight
Journeyman
Offline
Posts: 185
Respect: 0
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 11, 2006, 03:04:39 am » |
0
|
agree tinsley if healthy is a great point
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sanity is for the weak
|
|
|
|
