UNIT
Hall of Famer
 Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: July 31, 2008, 09:32:30 pm » |
0
|
"8.1 points and 4.9 rebounds"
Murphy and Baston can do that. in 16 mins? 61.6% from field. exactly, too bad we're not letting him walk landry, head, 09 2nd round pick and cash for brandon rush lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dynasty
MVP
Offline
Posts: 14303
Respect: +788
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 31, 2008, 09:35:49 pm » |
0
|
"8.1 points and 4.9 rebounds"
Murphy and Baston can do that. in 16 mins? 61.6% from field. exactly, too bad we're not letting him walk landry, head, 09 2nd round pick and cash for brandon rush They already have Scola, Dorsey, and Hayes. If Landry is there it just stunts his development and it creates a logjam at power forward. Dorsey is going to be a very good player IMO, and Scola already is. Chuck Hayes isn't bad. So why should they increase their payroll to keep a guy who's going to be among a 4-man rotation for 1 position? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
shangrila
MVP
Offline
Posts: 6728
All we see or seem is a dream within a dream
Respect: 0
|
|
« Reply #17 on: August 01, 2008, 12:51:01 am » |
0
|
Andrew Bogut anyone? Pacers wouldn't be able to get him |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jtan08
Journeyman
Offline
Posts: 261
Respect: 0
|
|
« Reply #18 on: August 01, 2008, 01:23:02 am » |
0
|
"8.1 points and 4.9 rebounds"
Murphy and Baston can do that. in 16 mins? 61.6% from field. exactly, too bad we're not letting him walk landry, head, 09 2nd round pick and cash for brandon rush no way |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
t-mac357
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 23980
Respect: +227
|
|
« Reply #19 on: August 01, 2008, 04:07:13 am » |
0
|
"8.1 points and 4.9 rebounds"
Murphy and Baston can do that. in 16 mins? 61.6% from field. exactly, too bad we're not letting him walk landry, head, 09 2nd round pick and cash for brandon rush lol now you see where im coming from when people make rediculous offers for landry, and landry has played a successful season and playoffs |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BATMON
Journeyman
Offline
Posts: 121
Respect: 0
|
|
« Reply #20 on: August 01, 2008, 05:21:50 am » |
0
|
"8.1 points and 4.9 rebounds"
Murphy and Baston can do that. in 16 mins? 61.6% from field. that still doesnt mean his averages automatically grow if he gets 30-35 minutes per. 16/10? I seriously doubt that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
|
« Reply #21 on: August 01, 2008, 08:19:36 am » |
0
|
"8.1 points and 4.9 rebounds"
Murphy and Baston can do that. in 16 mins? 61.6% from field. that still doesnt mean his averages automatically grow if he gets 30-35 minutes per. 16/10? I seriously doubt that. 15/9 is very gettable for him in 30 mins. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dynasty
MVP
Offline
Posts: 14303
Respect: +788
|
|
« Reply #22 on: August 01, 2008, 08:39:44 am » |
0
|
"8.1 points and 4.9 rebounds"
Murphy and Baston can do that. in 16 mins? 61.6% from field. that still doesnt mean his averages automatically grow if he gets 30-35 minutes per. 16/10? I seriously doubt that. 15/9 is very gettable for him in 30 mins. or at least somewhere around that. BATMON, u do realize that he's only going to be in his second year so there's a lot of room to improve. He's a late-bloomer, so why not sign him? Like I said, it's not some salary cap binding contract. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BATMON
Journeyman
Offline
Posts: 121
Respect: 0
|
|
« Reply #23 on: August 01, 2008, 10:34:18 am » |
0
|
"8.1 points and 4.9 rebounds"
Murphy and Baston can do that. in 16 mins? 61.6% from field. that still doesnt mean his averages automatically grow if he gets 30-35 minutes per. 16/10? I seriously doubt that. 15/9 is very gettable for him in 30 mins. or at least somewhere around that. BATMON, u do realize that he's only going to be in his second year so there's a lot of room to improve. He's a late-bloomer, so why not sign him? Like I said, it's not some salary cap binding contract. I just dont see this guy becoming Carlos Boozer, given a starting spot and 40 mins. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BATMON
Journeyman
Offline
Posts: 121
Respect: 0
|
|
« Reply #24 on: August 01, 2008, 10:36:22 am » |
0
|
Andrew Bogut anyone? Pacers wouldn't be able to get him Sorry i didnt mean trying to acquire him. But remember how hyped up he was? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
shangrila
MVP
Offline
Posts: 6728
All we see or seem is a dream within a dream
Respect: 0
|
|
« Reply #25 on: August 01, 2008, 06:08:24 pm » |
0
|
Yeah fair enough
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dynasty
MVP
Offline
Posts: 14303
Respect: +788
|
|
« Reply #26 on: August 01, 2008, 09:13:40 pm » |
0
|
Andrew Bogut anyone? Pacers wouldn't be able to get him Sorry i didnt mean trying to acquire him. But remember how hyped up he was? Was he worth the #1 pick? Probably not! But he is still a good player and averaged 14 and 9 last year and he's only 23 years old. And seriously, why are u so against getting Landry? I keep bringing up that it wouldn't be a salary cap binding contract. He is a young player with room to improve given more playing time and he's better than anybody they have at the power forward position at this point. Nobody is expecting him to come in and average 20 and 10, something like 12 and 8 would be good enough for a young player. And at this point, he's better than anybody else out there on the free agent market not named Josh Smith or Andre Iguodala. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BATMON
Journeyman
Offline
Posts: 121
Respect: 0
|
|
« Reply #27 on: August 02, 2008, 08:42:48 am » |
0
|
I just dont think Landry makes the Pacers better.
Im willing to see what Baston,Murphy,McRoberts,Nesterovic,Hibbert and Foster does this year before the Pacers add another player to the frontline.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dynasty
MVP
Offline
Posts: 14303
Respect: +788
|
|
« Reply #28 on: August 02, 2008, 12:15:58 pm » |
0
|
I just dont think Landry makes the Pacers better.
Im willing to see what Baston,Murphy,McRoberts,Nesterovic,Hibbert and Foster does this year before the Pacers add another player to the frontline. okay fair enough, but I just personally think Baston and Nesterovich were taken on because of their expiring contracts and Foster will likely get dealt sometime between now and next offseason, cause even though he is a favorite of Jim O'Brien he deserves to play and he doesn't look like he's in their future plans. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BATMON
Journeyman
Offline
Posts: 121
Respect: 0
|
|
« Reply #29 on: August 02, 2008, 06:19:27 pm » |
0
|
I just dont think Landry makes the Pacers better.
Im willing to see what Baston,Murphy,McRoberts,Nesterovic,Hibbert and Foster does this year before the Pacers add another player to the frontline. okay fair enough, but I just personally think Baston and Nesterovich were taken on because of their expiring contracts and Foster will likely get dealt sometime between now and next offseason, cause even though he is a favorite of Jim O'Brien he deserves to play and he doesn't look like he's in their future plans. Cool. Lets say Baston and Nesterovic leave and Landry joins. Would u still look for a PF/C that's proven or would u wait for Landry to develop? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
