Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
 
Author Topic: Without Granger, better?  (Read 5497 times)
UNIT
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17983


Respect: +57

« on: March 08, 2009, 03:00:36 am »
0

without granger we are starting TJ, Jarret and Marquis... which is a 3 headed pentrating snake...

its turned us from a jump shooting team in crunch time... to a slashing team in crunch time..

we have become more effiecent.. not taking anything away from grangers overall game but...

he needs to become a slasher 1st... shooter 2nd.. he if really wants to help the pacers win close games.
Logged
tchman58
Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1620

Respect: +17

« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2009, 11:33:42 am »
0

hawks will take granger off your hands if you dont want him. 
Logged
UNIT
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17983


Respect: +57

« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2009, 01:16:52 am »
0

just give us JJ and JSmith
Logged
tchman58
Star
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1620

Respect: +17

« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2009, 07:13:50 am »
0

i'd give you josh smith in a heart beat. 
Logged
t-mac357
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 23980


Respect: +227

« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2009, 05:00:31 am »
0

just give us JJ and JSmith

all that for granger?
Logged

UNIT
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17983


Respect: +57

« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2009, 08:17:42 am »
0

just give us JJ and JSmith

all that for granger?

calm down dad.
Logged
t-mac357
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 23980


Respect: +227

« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2009, 03:41:15 pm »
0


what's funny is, if i was the pacer's gm, i wouldn't take that trade
Logged

UNIT
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17983


Respect: +57

« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2009, 12:32:39 am »
0


what's funny is, if i was the pacer's gm, i wouldn't take that trade

thats why you dont have the job.


TJ Ford -- Jarrett Jack -- Travis Deiner
Joe Johnson -- Brandon Rush
Mike Dunleavy -- Marquis Daniels
Josh Smith -- Troy Murphy
Roy Hibbert -- Jeff Foster -- Rasho Nesterovic
Logged
t-mac357
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 23980


Respect: +227

« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2009, 04:26:13 am »
0

that's still a first round playoff team at best, depending on how smith plays in a slower paced environment

so in a sense, all you gained was a very expensive team, slightly better than the granger led pacers, congrats, that's what we call nba success Roll Eyes
Logged

UNIT
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17983


Respect: +57

« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2009, 07:48:59 pm »
0

umm marquis/nexterovic comes off the books... we are only paying big bucks to TJ, MIKE, Murphy, JJ, Jsmith... sounds like your average roster to me.
Logged
t-mac357
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 23980


Respect: +227

« Reply #10 on: March 18, 2009, 04:26:53 am »
0

"only" paying big bucks to 5 players? keep in mind none of them are going to elevate your team to a contender, unneccesary move on the part of the pacers, even though they get talent
Logged

UNIT
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17983


Respect: +57

« Reply #11 on: March 18, 2009, 06:20:48 am »
0

you realise granger is only 22 months younger than joe johnson?

while josh smith is only 23.

it stiill gives us time to build around JJ/JS, when others come off the books.. or make cap room to sign big free agent.
Logged
JerseyBlaze
Undrafted
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 33

Respect: 0

« Reply #12 on: March 18, 2009, 09:09:39 am »
0

without granger we are starting TJ, Jarret and Marquis... which is a 3 headed pentrating snake...

its turned us from a jump shooting team in crunch time... to a slashing team in crunch time..

we have become more effiecent.. not taking anything away from grangers overall game but...

he needs to become a slasher 1st... shooter 2nd.. he if really wants to help the pacers win close games.

Nets could seriously use Granger. We would be serious playoff contenders with him. Bring em on our way. Ill give u Bobby Simmons, Sean Williams, and Yi Jianlian for Danny Granger and Jamaal Tinsley. Wats good?
Logged
UNIT
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17983


Respect: +57

« Reply #13 on: March 18, 2009, 08:26:49 pm »
0

haha

u mean harris/lopez for granger...
Logged
t-mac357
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 23980


Respect: +227

« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2009, 12:53:08 am »
0

you realise granger is only 22 months younger than joe johnson?

while josh smith is only 23.

it stiill gives us time to build around JJ/JS, when others come off the books.. or make cap room to sign big free agent.

you say 22 months like its a short amount of time, that's basically 2 years

jj has reached his ceiling, granger hasn't, still could get alot better
Logged

Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
 
 
Jump to: