Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down
 
Author Topic: Indy Cornrows: Pacers Swap #13 for Chicago's #16 and #26  (Read 6983 times)
No Pressure
MVP
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8317


Soul-

Respect: +432

« Reply #45 on: June 25, 2009, 04:42:51 pm »
0

How about Deng, Tyrus, Gray, #16 & 26 for Amare & #14? If they accept that deal and we draft Mullin with #14 then we have no need for Gray.
Then we sign Gordon to a one year deal, next year with Tim Thomas, B. Miller, J. James, & B. Gordon coming off the books we go after Wade, would this lineup attract wade?
Rose
Wade
Salmons
Amare
Noah/Mullins
Our bench would come from, trading Kirk for a draft pick and/or a backup, 2010 draft picks, MLE FA & LLE FA.
Does this looks like a team that could contend?

No i don't think that lineup would attract Wade.  There is already a Wade playing at his position Grin.  Seriously though, unless Amare takes a pay cut, you can't have both him and Wade.
« Last Edit: June 25, 2009, 05:16:31 pm by No Pressure » Logged

topbullsfan
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 458

Respect: +26

« Reply #46 on: June 25, 2009, 05:06:47 pm »
0

How about Deng, Tyrus, Gray, #16 & 26 for Amare & #14? If they accept that deal and we draft Mullin with #14 then we have no need for Gray.
Then we sign Gordon to a one year deal, next year with Tim Thomas, B. Miller, J. James, & B. Gordon coming off the books we go after Wade, would this lineup attract wade?
Rose
Wade
Salmons
Amare
Noah/Mullins
Our bench would come from, trading Kirk for a draft pick and/or a backup, 2010 draft picks, MLE FA & LLE FA.
Does this looks like a team that could contend?

No i don't think that lineup would attract Wade.  There is already a Wade playing at his posistion.  Seriously though, unless Amare takes a pay cut, you can't have both him and Wade.
What are you talking about, The Wade listed there is D. Wade, and YES we could afford to pay both Wade and Amare both max deals. The total for all those players including our draft picks is around 54,500,000 plus the player we get from the Kirk trade, after signing Wade we can then sign a MLE & LLE plus a couple of min. salary players. So yes it is possible.
Nopressure, Please keep your negative comments to yourself, you are always putting down other peoples ideas, and half the time you dont know what you are talking about!!!!
Logged

bullsfan
No Pressure
MVP
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8317


Soul-

Respect: +432

« Reply #47 on: June 25, 2009, 05:18:17 pm »
0

How about Deng, Tyrus, Gray, #16 & 26 for Amare & #14? If they accept that deal and we draft Mullin with #14 then we have no need for Gray.
Then we sign Gordon to a one year deal, next year with Tim Thomas, B. Miller, J. James, & B. Gordon coming off the books we go after Wade, would this lineup attract wade?
Rose
Wade
Salmons
Amare
Noah/Mullins
Our bench would come from, trading Kirk for a draft pick and/or a backup, 2010 draft picks, MLE FA & LLE FA.
Does this looks like a team that could contend?

No i don't think that lineup would attract Wade.  There is already a Wade playing at his posistion.  Seriously though, unless Amare takes a pay cut, you can't have both him and Wade.
What are you talking about, The Wade listed there is D. Wade, and YES we could afford to pay both Wade and Amare both max deals. The total for all those players including our draft picks is around 54,500,000 plus the player we get from the Kirk trade, after signing Wade we can then sign a MLE & LLE plus a couple of min. salary players. So yes it is possible.
Nopressure, Please keep your negative comments to yourself, you are always putting down other peoples ideas, and half the time you dont know what you are talking about!!!!

God you are just so blind!  You act like money grows on trees.  Rose will need a extension think of that?  Do you know what a salary cap is?  Sometimes i wonder if people actually even know what they are talking about.
Logged

topbullsfan
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 458

Respect: +26

« Reply #48 on: June 25, 2009, 05:30:48 pm »
0

Are you kidding me? The salary cap is around 60,000,000 and many teams have salaries at 70-85 million. Incase you dont understand the salary cap is not a hard cap, each year you can sign a MLE at around 6 million and everyother year you can sign a LLE (I dont know the dollar amount) and go over the cap with those signings. Plus you can sign your own FA's for more and go over the cap, and 2010 is not the year to give Rose an extension the year after between his 3 & 4 year is when he needs a raise. That means the Bulls would have a high salary in 2010, and in 2011 maybe even in the Lux. tax range, which the owner said he would pay for a contender.
Logged

bullsfan
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
 
 
Jump to: