Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
 
Author Topic: Chicago Welcomes Ben Wallace  (Read 5540 times)
mrpooh
Journeyman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 143

Respect: 0

« on: July 13, 2006, 04:30:56 pm »
0

A great day to be a bulls fan!!!


http://www.nba.com/bulls/wallace_intro.html
Logged
lakerfanryan8
Starter
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 935


Respect: 0

« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2006, 04:45:38 pm »
0

what a good addition
Logged

lakerfanryan8 is on the "Greg Oden will be a bust bandwagon."

Joshua
Journeyman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 207

Respect: 0

« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2006, 07:10:10 pm »
0

Good addition for the present, not for the future though...
Logged

lakerfanryan8
Starter
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 935


Respect: 0

« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2006, 07:10:57 pm »
0

Yeah they might regret the big money they spent
Logged

lakerfanryan8 is on the "Greg Oden will be a bust bandwagon."

nguyenpeter
Journeyman
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 123

Respect: 0

« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2006, 07:32:24 pm »
0

Maybe they'll regret it in a couple of years but right now they should be very happy.
Logged
lakerfanryan8
Starter
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 935


Respect: 0

« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2006, 07:36:59 pm »
0

I can see the Bulls going deep into the playoffs
Logged

lakerfanryan8 is on the "Greg Oden will be a bust bandwagon."

BlueDemon
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 417


Respect: 0

« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2006, 07:51:17 pm »
0

Quote from: "Joshua"
Good addition for the present, not for the future though...


Dead horse, meet Joshua.  Good Lord - would you just GO AWAY ALREADY.  You've made your feelings abundantly clear in previous posts.  

Bulls = bad, Pistons = good.  Wallace = old, injured, short, no offense.  Worst signing ever.  Got it.  Now shoo.  We all promise to be unhappy with the Wallace signing if you would just go back to bothering other teams' boards.  Your specialty, apparently.
Logged
lakerfanryan8
Starter
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 935


Respect: 0

« Reply #7 on: July 13, 2006, 08:12:26 pm »
0

Why you so negative?
Logged

lakerfanryan8 is on the "Greg Oden will be a bust bandwagon."

BlueDemon
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 417


Respect: 0

« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2006, 06:24:36 am »
0

Quote from: "lakerfanryan8"
Why you so negative?


You missed our earlier exchange.
Logged
lakerfanryan8
Starter
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 935


Respect: 0

« Reply #9 on: July 14, 2006, 09:15:10 am »
0

oh ok
Logged

lakerfanryan8 is on the "Greg Oden will be a bust bandwagon."

BlueDemon
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 417


Respect: 0

« Reply #10 on: July 14, 2006, 09:31:09 am »
0

http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/basketball/bulls/cs-060713bullsbits,1,5597318.story?coll=cs-bulls-headlines

Good article in the Trib today.  What is says in summary :

- Regarding Wallace's deal - it's more front loaded so the Bulls will have more $$$ to sign their own guys to extensions in the coming years.  

- As Pax hinted earlier, he's still looking trade to fill up another spot.

- Songalia will not be re-signed since Wallace is eating up most of this year's $17.5M in extra cap money.  I liked Songalia for what he brought.  Kind of a plodder but decent defense and perimeter shooting for a big man.  Could help a number of teams.
Logged
Something-To-Say
Starter
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 783


Respect: 0

« Reply #11 on: July 14, 2006, 12:04:12 pm »
0

ironic, the picture on that page shows him shooting a free throw. Hopefully you won't have to see that very much.
Logged

someguy132
Undrafted
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7

Respect: 0

« Reply #12 on: July 14, 2006, 01:26:38 pm »
0

if the cap is 53.135 mil and the bulls have currently 30 mil spent(according to hoopshype) then wouldnt we ahve like 23 mil and not 17.5 mil? thus allowing even if wallace has a front loaded deal around 17 mil first year then leave like 5-6 mil left?
Logged
Something-To-Say
Starter
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 783


Respect: 0

« Reply #13 on: July 14, 2006, 02:05:00 pm »
0

Hoopshype doesn't have the Chandler deal in yet. Brown and Smith total to 67,000 over 9 mil. So not much difference but point is, it's not all updated.

Hoopshype also has Eisley on the Suns page for god knows what reason, but he's not there, we dont pay him anymore
Logged

BlueDemon
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 417


Respect: 0

« Reply #14 on: July 14, 2006, 02:06:51 pm »
0

Quote from: "someguy132"
if the cap is 53.135 mil and the bulls have currently 30 mil spent(according to hoopshype) then wouldnt we ahve like 23 mil and not 17.5 mil? thus allowing even if wallace has a front loaded deal around 17 mil first year then leave like 5-6 mil left?


Perhaps they don't have the rookie salaries calculated in the payroll yet.  T2 and Thabo are still unsigned.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
 
 
Jump to: