Greenwing is in a very losable match here, read the quotes from jkilla.
A mosque built just two blocks away from where the world trade center towers used to stand wouldnt just upset me, it would enrage me and compell me to take action.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/08/20/national/main6789917.shtmlJim Riches, a former New York Fire Department deputy chief whose son, Jimmy, was killed at the trade center, believes the dispute has nothing to do with religious freedom.
"We're not telling them not to practice their religion. ... It's about location, location, location," he said, asking why the mosque couldn't be built farther away from the land that he still considers a cemetery. "It's disrespectful. You wouldn't put a Japanese cultural center at Pearl Harbor."
Peter Gadiel says he owes no apologies for singling one group out. Since his son, James, was killed at the trade center, Gadiel has argued publicly that all Muslims should share some collective guilt for what happened on Sept. 11, 2001.
"The fact is that Islam does not coexist well with other religions, and you can't separate that from Islam," the Kent, Conn., resident said, explaining his stand against the mosque. "
If that sounds intolerant on my part, that's too bad." Oh but what of the families of the Muslims who died that day? What if they think it is insulting to them that they are not allowed to have a place near that area to pray for their dead brothers/sister/children/parents?
then they will have to suffer because the simple fact is that more christians, catholics, jews, etc. died that day than muslims.