Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
 
Author Topic: 2007 draft  (Read 6833 times)
sagaliba
Undrafted
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 88

Respect: 0

« on: June 18, 2007, 12:18:19 pm »
0

What do you guys think about the coming draft? Jason Smith seems fit Wizards well. I also think Wizards can trade Haywood + their #16 pick for Atlanta or Memphis and get Al Horford.
Logged
Ghettosermon
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 741

Respect: 0

« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2007, 03:22:34 pm »
0

lol, I need what you are smoking, #16 and Brendan Haywood for #4, lol. Anyways with Pecherov coming over, and hopefully a Haywood trade for a guy like Magloire and using on MLE on a defensive big man I'd like to see us go after a starting SG in case Deshawn leaves or if he stays someone so Jarvis never has to play again. I'd like an NBA ready guy like Derrick Byars. He is everything we need, plays great defense most importantly, but also can play the 2 and 3 and a little 1, can pass, rebound, drive, shoot, also he is a local guy from UVA so to me he is the money pick. Obviously if a guy like Nick Young drops we swoop him. I hate Jason Smith he brings us nothing new.  A bad rebounder and weak inside, his strength is from the outside. Obviously a reach but I wouldn't mind Sean Williams shot blocking at #16. 2nd rounder I want an NBA ready guy who can play like Jared Dudley or Herbert Hill.
Logged


Wizards and Hawks Loyalist
steve
MVP
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12058


I've grown to hate you all.

Respect: +1110

« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2007, 04:25:31 pm »
0

I'm with you on drafting Derrick Byars, probably one of the top three or four all around players in the draft this year.
Logged

Put my existence on this forum against yours.  Toronto makes the playoffs.
sagaliba
Undrafted
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 88

Respect: 0

« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2007, 10:05:22 am »
0

As I researched further, I do not think Al Horford is a big improvement to Wizards. So I've changed my mind.

As for Magloire, it has been discussed many times before, his style does not fit with Wizards, and defensively he is not even as good a shot blocker as Haywood is.

Ghettosermon, if you really want what I was smoking, send the money into my off-shore account first.
Logged
Ghettosermon
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 741

Respect: 0

« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2007, 10:42:52 am »
0

Quote from: "sagaliba"
As I researched further, I do not think Al Horford is a big improvement to Wizards. So I've changed my mind.

As for Magloire, it has been discussed many times before, his style does not fit with Wizards, and defensively he is not even as good a shot blocker as Haywood is.

Ghettosermon, if you really want what I was smoking, send the money into my off-shore account first.


Horford would not be a big improvement over Haywood, Etan, Ruffin, Booth, Blatche, Mike Hall? Do you really watch the Wizards?

Plus your trade of Haywood and 16 for #3 or 4 had me laughing all day.
Logged


Wizards and Hawks Loyalist
sagaliba
Undrafted
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 88

Respect: 0

« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2007, 12:37:02 pm »
0

Ghettosermon,

Let's just put it this way, unless you go to Wizards practices, there is no way you've watched more Wizards games than I do. I do admit though, I do not watch a whole lot of college basketball games, so I am not that familiar with some draft picks.

Regarding Haywood, the problem is he wants out, not that I want to rid off him. What do you think you can trade Haywood for?

Now, IF you really think Horford is a BIG improvement over the big men Wizards got, what's wrong with trading Haywood and #16 for him? If you really watched Wizards games as you seem to claim, you would know a good man and a good sixth man are exactly what Wizards need (other than having the players play some defense, but that's another story). Among the two, a good big man is always tougher to get, so why wouldn't you do anything possible to accomplish it even though the price may appear to be high?
Logged
Ghettosermon
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 741

Respect: 0

« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2007, 12:53:26 pm »
0

Quote from: "sagaliba"
Ghettosermon,

Let's just put it this way, unless you go to Wizards practices, there is no way you've watched more Wizards games than I do. I do admit though, I do not watch a whole lot of college basketball games, so I am not that familiar with some draft picks.

Regarding Haywood, the problem is he wants out, not that I want to rid off him. What do you think you can trade Haywood for?

Now, IF you really think Horford is a BIG improvement over the big men Wizards got, what's wrong with trading Haywood and #16 for him? If you really watched Wizards games as you seem to claim, you would know a good man and a good sixth man are exactly what Wizards need (other than having the players play some defense, but that's another story). Among the two, a good big man is always tougher to get, so why wouldn't you do anything possible to accomplish it even though the price may appear to be high?


The whole point is you'd have a better chance of trading Jarvis Hayes for Kobe Bryant than trading 16 and Haywood for the 3rd or 4th pick in the draft. I do have season tickets so I'm sure I know my Wiz. I'm sure you know your stuff on the Wizards but you probably don't know much on the value of picks and trade, to put it like this Jamison and the 16th pick would not get us the 3rd pick in the draft, not to mention Haywoods trade value is rock bottom, now adding that he argues with teammates and coaches to add to the fact that he is a below average center and highly inconsistent. We couldn't get much for Haywood.
Logged


Wizards and Hawks Loyalist
cselby
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 42172


Respect: +2791

« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2007, 01:12:55 pm »
0

Logged



Soon....
Ghettosermon
Benchwarmer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 741

Respect: 0

« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2007, 04:51:50 pm »
0

Quote from: "cselby"


Wow cool, yet your team didn't make it any farther than are's in the playoffs even though we were missing 2 allstars, lol. Atleast we lost to an NBA finals participant.
Logged


Wizards and Hawks Loyalist
tong
MVP
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5893


Respect: 0

« Reply #9 on: June 19, 2007, 07:38:25 pm »
0

stop flaming ruff guys, he is my boy


:lol:
Logged


jordan
Guest
« Reply #10 on: June 19, 2007, 07:49:50 pm »
0

Quote from: "Ghettosermon"
Quote from: "cselby"


Wow cool, yet your team didn't make it any farther than are's in the playoffs even though we were missing 2 allstars, lol. Atleast we lost to an NBA finals participant.

True, but we faced one of the most experienced teams in the Finals.
If the Raps and Wizards faced, there is no doubt in my mind that the Raps would win 6.
Logged
cselby
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 42172


Respect: +2791

« Reply #11 on: June 19, 2007, 08:16:16 pm »
0

lol, nothing was really meant by it, I was just kind of in the mood for it. Wasn't really looking for a flame war.
















But you guys did get swept.
Logged



Soon....
tong
MVP
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5893


Respect: 0

« Reply #12 on: June 19, 2007, 08:48:31 pm »
0

Quote from: "cselby"
lol, nothing was really meant by it, I was just kind of in the mood for it. Wasn't really looking for a flame war.
















But you guys did get swept.



hows that flame war goin?
Logged


cselby
Hall of Famer
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 42172


Respect: +2791

« Reply #13 on: June 19, 2007, 08:53:58 pm »
0

lol, must..resist..okay. No more. I like the Wizards..the Wizards are nice..
Logged



Soon....
tong
MVP
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5893


Respect: 0

« Reply #14 on: June 20, 2007, 12:28:02 am »
0

Quote from: "cselby"
lol, must..resist..okay. No more. I like the Wizards..the Wizards are nice..


LOL
Logged


Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
 
 
Jump to: