olsons3
Benchwarmer
Offline
Posts: 633
Respect: 0
|
 |
« on: July 26, 2006, 11:09:19 am » |
0
|
Sarunas Jasikevicious Stephen Jackson Jeff Foster
to Milwaukee for...
Jamal Magloire Dan Gadzuric
Just a thought... feel free to discuss amongst yourselves...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Boom Baby!!!!
|
|
|
lakerfanryan8
Starter
Offline
Posts: 935
Respect: 0
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2006, 03:38:43 pm » |
0
|
Milwaukee is short on Centers. Why would they want to do that???
|
|
|
Logged
|
lakerfanryan8 is on the "Greg Oden will be a bust bandwagon." 
|
|
|
olsons3
Benchwarmer
Offline
Posts: 633
Respect: 0
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2006, 07:41:49 pm » |
0
|
True but Milwaukee would end up no worse in the center area. They also gain a good point guard and a solid swing man, both areas they are short in right now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Boom Baby!!!!
|
|
|
lakerfanryan8
Starter
Offline
Posts: 935
Respect: 0
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2006, 07:49:23 pm » |
0
|
I heard the Lakers are intrested in Magloire. I am not sure if their is any truth though
|
|
|
Logged
|
lakerfanryan8 is on the "Greg Oden will be a bust bandwagon." 
|
|
|
cucumberjones
Benchwarmer
Offline
Posts: 349
Respect: 0
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2006, 01:05:47 am » |
0
|
It sounds like a good, and fair, trade for both teams.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2006, 01:33:07 am » |
0
|
i think jackson, harrison for maglore and pick is the best trade with milwaukee(believe me ive looked at this many times)
pacers should have lineup of
1.Tinsley -passer and creater 2.Daniels -dribble penetrator and spot up 20 foot shooter 3.Harrington -wing slasher and post up mismatch 4.Oneal -will have more energy for post up offence with maglore 5.Maglore -rebounder and body banger for oneal
6.Sarunas -opens up space in transition and spot up 3s 7.Armstrong -turns are bench into the cheerleaders of the mavs 8.Green -athletic defender can guard 1 and 2 effectively 9.White -excells in transition and isolation can guard 2 or 3 10.Granger -the 6thman spark, comes in for AH as SF, or for Jo moving AH to Pf, or Maglore making them go small. 11.Williams -backup 3,4 can be brought along slow with AH JO DG in the 3,4 12.Foster -great back up spark for either 4,5
pacers are small but still have strength.
plus they should add another big body with MLE and maybe keep Marshall and Powell for 14th and 15th positions cause there actaully not bad youth players from the many mavs games ive downloaded.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
olsons3
Benchwarmer
Offline
Posts: 633
Respect: 0
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2006, 02:06:18 pm » |
0
|
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/trademachineCool site to see if trades can work. The Jackson - Harrison for Magloire would work, but the Pacers gain salary, when they are trying to lose salary. I also see the Pacers not wanting to have a $4mil salary guard sitting, so Saras is going somewhere. In my original Saras-Jackson-Foster for Magloire-Gadzuric the Pacers create another $2mil plus of cap room.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Boom Baby!!!!
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: August 03, 2006, 06:23:00 am » |
0
|
Indiana Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Stephen Jackson Jamaal Tinsley Shawne Williams
Incoming Steve Francis David Lee
Pacers sign Bonzi Wells with the MLE.
New York Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Jalen Rose Steve Francis David Lee
Incoming
Stephen Jackson Jamaal Tinsley Kenyon Martin Ruben Patterson
Denver Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Kenyon Martin Ruben Patterson
Incoming
Shawne Williams Jalen Rose
Successful Scenario. The Trade ID for this scenario is 3323671.
I liked this idea and still use trade exception for AL/Edwards
PG: FRANCIS :SARUNAS, ARMSTRONG,GREEN SG:WELLS :WHITE, MARSHALL SF:GRANGER :DANIELS, POWELL PF:HARRINGTON :LEE , BASTON C:ONEAL :FOSTER, HARRISON,EDWARDS
-We are much more athletic -We have scoring and defencive options -We still have youth -We just cut 2 players from this list -Danny gets too start -We contend now -Oneal gets two budies in AL,Wells -Daniels can come in and play the point letting francis focus more on scoring
-Most importantly these players are less injury prone.. so we have no excuse if we fail..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: August 03, 2006, 06:41:20 am » |
0
|
I should explain the reason behind Denver and New York
Denver: -Makes room for nene -Gets youth from the draft in Williams.. cause they didnt have a first rounder -They get one of the highest expiring contracts -More flexibility at the SG/SF positions now
NEW YORK: -Gets there lost post threat in Martin -They split the marbury/francis thing -They get a solid backup for Marbury in Tinsley -They get a experienced SG/SF in Jackson -Ruben just adds hard depth behind Crawford/Rich/Jackson -They still have rookies Nate and Frye and the draft pick guy (lol forgot his name already)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
olsons3
Benchwarmer
Offline
Posts: 633
Respect: 0
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: August 03, 2006, 10:23:31 am » |
0
|
New Trade since Magloire is gone...
Tinsley - Jackson - Foster
to Sacremento for
Wells - B. Miller
Feel Free to discuss...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Boom Baby!!!!
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: August 04, 2006, 02:02:25 am » |
0
|
then we only got sarunas?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
olsons3
Benchwarmer
Offline
Posts: 633
Respect: 0
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: August 04, 2006, 08:22:31 pm » |
0
|
then we only got sarunas? Sarunas Armstrong Oriene Green Jimmy "Snap" Hunter Start Sarunas. Bring in Armstrong off the bench. We also have White who can play a little PG. Armstrong can work with Greene and Hunter so they are ready for primetime. Greene is a tenacious defender and Hunter is a scorer. Both are a bit raw, but worth putting time into. It may not be the best hope at PG, but it would be somewhat stable, and provide for a future. I just hate the thought of betting our future on Tinsley being able to remain healthy.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Boom Baby!!!!
|
|
|
UNIT
Hall of Famer
Offline
Posts: 17983
Respect: +57
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: August 04, 2006, 09:10:32 pm » |
0
|
since everyone started about the quality of Tinsley.. i started watching all my downloaded games of Tinsley playing healthy.. he won about 90% of the duals with the opponant starting pg.. let alone the team played a hell of alot better with him on the court.. so i still believe hes a top 5 pure pg..
(Nash.. Paul.. Kidd.. Billups..Tinsley) thats as far as pure pgs go...(billups isnt always a 1 man anyway)
lol but you guys just talk about his injuries..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
olsons3
Benchwarmer
Offline
Posts: 633
Respect: 0
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: August 05, 2006, 05:16:43 pm » |
0
|
since everyone started about the quality of Tinsley.. i started watching all my downloaded games of Tinsley playing healthy.. he won about 90% of the duals with the opponant starting pg.. let alone the team played a hell of alot better with him on the court.. so i still believe hes a top 5 pure pg..
(Nash.. Paul.. Kidd.. Billups..Tinsley) thats as far as pure pgs go...(billups isnt always a 1 man anyway)
lol but you guys just talk about his injuries.. I don't think that anyone doubts his ability to play basketball. I just doubt his ability to play every night. Hard to build a team around a guy in street clothes.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Boom Baby!!!!
|
|
|
|